We can not refuse to accept reality as it truly is. The public school system is a disaster. I’ve been hearing elected representatives talk about how the public school system needs to be restructured, and I wondered what that meant. So, I looked it up in The New World Order, which can be found for free online if you know where to look. There are plenty of people who would sneer at such a source, because the very term “conspiracy theory” creates a knee-jerk denial response to every idea which follows. The truth is that rich psychopaths conspire together to remain rich and alive, and always have done. If you can’t handle conspiracy factual history, you needed bother reading my words, even though they contain high octane speculation at times.
The purpose of The New World Order is to destroy the Monarchy, private property, inheritance, patriotism, the family structure, and all religions. At some point, I decided to cultivate a sufficient amount of cognitive dissonance to be able to hold both worlds, of Deep State shadowy control over the masses, and of nobody at the helm of the Illuminati Card Game factions, both in existence at the same time. It does not matter if anacyclosis occurs because it is guided that way by ruling men, by demons/archons, or by the inevitable cycles of materialist nature itself. That anacyclosis occurs throughout recorded history is a sufficient fact in and of itself to recognize that it is probably occurring right now.
The Great Reset purports to want to create community-based schools. The New World Order book purports that our dear leaders want to create public schools in which direct democracy of the students exists to decide what the students want to learn that day. We all know what happens when a group of 25 third graders decide what they are going to learn that day, and the entire class is bound by that decision. They never decide to learn the hard stuff, that needs to be known, and future failure is guaranteed. This doesn’t mean that self-determination is bad. Far from it! When it applies to a tribal group of people under Dunbar’s number instead of an imprisoned population grouped by age of manufacture, self-determination combined with subsidiarity works quite well.
The current setup of public schools is unsustainable, for a lot of different reasons. It depends on cheap oil. It is centralized, bloated, top-heavy, and bureaucratic. It is a school-to-prison pipeline. It doesn’t allow questioning or critical thinking to actually occur. These are all downstream effects of the way that the United States was created in the first place. Without a State religion, religious teaching in schools must be destroyed, or at least downplayed. Yet, at the same time, materialism technically counts as a religious worldview. Unfortunately, materialism itself is not a sustainable worldview. It doesn’t provide a binding function or a self-sacrifice for the greater good function. Societies throughout history which have become materialistic, which have destroyed the family structure by teaching what some call sexual deviancy and others call self-identification rights, have always collapsed. Again, we don’t need to know why these things are not sustainable, just the historical cycles as time-locked correlation.
Before the Prussian system of education, people were not idiots. They learned to read and write and cypher because it benefited them. They argued incessantly in the marketplace, and learned rhetoric. People who are “uneducated” do not have to be misinformed. In comparison to the very well educated, maybe they are less misinformed because they can be exposed to less propaganda. What does it matter? The publicly proclaimed argument for universal education was originally that people needed to be informed enough to vote. Actually, they wanted compliant obedient people who would actually shoot the enemy when told to do so at rates greater than 15% or so. After that, they wanted awesome factory workers who would clock in and clock out and do what they were told in the right sequence, and boy did they get that.
Automation changes the communitarian need for centralized educational practices. No longer do the senile elites want factory drones. What do they want instead though? The pipedream of students picking their own path is just that, a pipedream, and will never actually be allowed. It is already the case that the students in the upper-middle class schools are being pushed into the low-wage gig economy lifelong learning technological slavery system, where they type on keyboards in tiny little cubicles or tiny houses all day long, building their digital prison world. The public school system, therefore, is about to bifurcate. Tech serfs versus manual labor. They are already strongly discouraging college attendance. You don’t need to attend college to code, and sometimes it can be a hindrance. If you want to rule, or if you want to be a free entrepreneur? You don’t belong in the public school system anymore, at least not as the dear leaders have envisioned its future incarnation.
Fortunately, or unfortunately, depending on your perspective, anacyclosis will prevail, and the technocrats will fail. Direct democracy leads to mob rule, which leads to a complete breakdown of all society until the strong monarch arises once more uniting the warlords together. Peak oil is still a thing, which doesn’t mean that we run out of oil, it means it becomes more expensive and supply becomes more volatile. Weather modification wars or climate change (doesn’t really matter which one) is still a thing, and when combined with peak oil, almost certainly bodes ill for your local food supply. The US Dollar is due for a currency crisis. The centralization of public health measures must fail (see peak oil combined with expensive plastics and shipping time increases).
John Michael Greer says to “collapse first and avoid the rush.” Given that the public education system is not sustainable, and is not teaching your kids the necessary survival skills, such as when to disobey orders that get you killed for no benefit, can’t afford their busing system, won’t be able to afford basic supplies in a volatile or hyperstagflationary market in the future, isn’t it time to leave? Buckminster Fuller insists that you don’t fight the old system to win. Instead, you design a new system which makes the old system obsolete. I’m not a fan of new systems, though. Instead, I vastly prefer the really old systems, which have survived for tens of thousands of years because they worked well enough that even in the worst of times, they prevailed. This doesn’t mean that I shun all new technology. It means that I recognize that complexity is fragile, and regularly practice how to do things the old-fashioned way.
To win a fight, don’t be there. To win against mob rule, simply drop out, and don’t engage. Leave. Typically, you have three options: fight, flight, or fawn. Fighting is riskiest. Those groups which have adopted a policy of leaving communities which don’t respect them survive longer than those groups which stand their ground and fight against “the forces of evil.” Leaving is also risky, because you have to make a new agreement with the new land you live on. You leave established relationships. Fawning also works, but the soul death involved in hiding your true beliefs, feelings, and actions eventually causes isolation and suicide, or the Stockholm syndrome causes you to actually integrate and become a slave. Of course, you’re not limited to engaging in just one of these. You can engage in all three at the same time!
What does a public school have to become? What culture is necessary for its continued existence? Conformity, uniformity, obedience to authority, materialism, extinguishing religion, extinguishing parental authority and decision-making power, inflexibility, throwing out or denying services to the disabled, denying bodily autonomy of the students, denying proper informed consent, false choices, and trauma bonding.